| FDA and CBP Announce Computer System Changes Related to the Prior Notice Final Rule |
|
|
|
|
On November 7, 2008, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) published the "Prior Notice of Imported Food Final Rule" and a draft compliance policy guide (CPG) that outlines the agencies' enforcement policies regarding the final rule (73 Federal Register 66294 (final rule) and 73 Federal Register 66411 (CPG)). The final rule amended the existing Prior Notice Interim Final Rule (PN IFR) contained in 21 CFR Part 1, Subpart I, which has been in effect since December 12, 2003; the final rule takes effect on May 6, 2009. Also on May 6, 2009, FDA and CBP intend to announce the availability of the final CPG, which describes FDA and CBP's strategy for enforcing the requirements of the prior notice final rule while maintaining an uninterrupted flow of food imports. The prior notice final rule implements section 307 of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (the Bioterrorism Act) (21 U.S.C. 381), which requires that FDA receive prior notice of food imported into the United States. The final rule revises the IFR in only a few key areas, which were summarized in a Constituent Update of October 31, 2008 Beginning on May 6, 2009, FDA's Prior Notice System Interface (PNSI) may be used to file prior notices that account for and reflect requirement changes in the final rule. However, all CBP Automated Commercial System (ACS) and Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) programming changes will not be in place by May 6, 2009. As a result, import filers who file through the Automated Broker Interface (ABI) should be familiar with the final rule changes since they will need to adjust or retain their prior notice submissions in ABI/ACS as noted in the bulleted items below. Please note, however, that prior notices filed through ABI/ACS will be transmitted to FDA for review against the requirements in the final rule. For example, prior notices submitted through ABI/ACS that do not identify the site-specific manufacturer may be accepted for review initially, but upon review by FDA may be refused if they are later deemed inaccurate. Highlights of the final rule that require careful prior notice data submission by ABI filers:
Questions may be directed to the Prior Notice Center at 1-866-521-2297. For additional information: Prior Notice Fact Sheet March 2009 "What You Need to Know About Prior Notice of Imported Food Shipments: A Small Entity Compliance Guide" April 2009 |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Excellent Brand Application
| 1633 Bayshore Hwy #337Burlingame, CA 94010Tel: 650-692-6182 Fax: 650-692-6639 |
China Files WTO Complaints Over US Poultry Ban
Updated April 17, 2009 08:01 PM
GENEVA (Xinhua) - China filed complaints to the World Trade Organization (WTO) today about a US law effectively banning imports of Chinese poultry products, saying the law may violate WTO regulations.
Pursuant to Section 727 of the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009, which was already signed into law, the United States effectively prohibits the establishment or implementation of any measures that would allow poultry products to be imported from China, the Chinese WTO mission said.
China is concerned that Section 727 places restrictions on the import from China of poultry products that are inconsistent with the United States' WTO obligations, it added.
Scares involving the potentially deadly E. coli bacteria, salmonella, listeria and other threats have harmed consumer confidence, prompting industry support for some tougher measures, J. Patrick Boyle, the president of the American Meat Institute, said today at a congressional hearing. The added cost to defend the food supply may be burdensome, he said.
“Only industry can provide safe food,” and voluntary collaboration with government will do more to protect consumers than additional rules, Boyle told the House Agriculture Committee. Boyle’s group represents Tyson Foods Inc., the biggest U.S. meat processor, and other meatpackers.
Congress is increasing the food-safety budget to add inspection resources and considering more than a dozen proposals to combat food-borne illness. They include legislation, approved by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, to grant the Food and Drug Administration authority to order food recalls even when a company refuses to cooperate.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aAD65Z3FeyRo
| « | < | September 2010 | > | » |
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 |
|
September 18, 2007 In responding to the public's concern of the safety of imported food, Oriental Food Association has hosted a "imported Food Safety Forum on Sept 18, 2007 at Asian Culture Center, Oakland, Califorina. FDA San Francisco District Director Barbara Cassens and USDA SITC Officer John Nelson were invited to give speech. Taylor Chow, Public Relations, represented to Association's position. You may see the first 3 portions of the video by clicking the links below: Part 1 of 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9xJJ2WsIA8 Part 2 of 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpAfw8Qw74g Part 3 of 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQJgT_2y1Es |