You are here: Home
FDA and CBP Announce Computer System Changes Related to the Prior Notice Final Rule PDF Print E-mail

On November 7, 2008, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) published the "Prior Notice of Imported Food Final Rule" and a draft compliance policy guide (CPG) that outlines the agencies' enforcement policies regarding the final rule (73 Federal Register 66294 (final rule) and 73 Federal Register 66411 (CPG)). The final rule amended the existing Prior Notice Interim Final Rule (PN IFR) contained in 21 CFR Part 1, Subpart I, which has been in effect since December 12, 2003; the final rule takes effect on May 6, 2009. Also on May 6, 2009, FDA and CBP intend to announce the availability of the final CPG, which describes FDA and CBP's strategy for enforcing the requirements of the prior notice final rule while maintaining an uninterrupted flow of food imports.

The prior notice final rule implements section 307 of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (the Bioterrorism Act) (21 U.S.C. 381), which requires that FDA receive prior notice of food imported into the United States. The final rule revises the IFR in only a few key areas, which were summarized in a Constituent Update of October 31, 2008

Beginning on May 6, 2009, FDA's Prior Notice System Interface (PNSI) may be used to file prior notices that account for and reflect requirement changes in the final rule. However, all CBP Automated Commercial System (ACS) and Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) programming changes will not be in place by May 6, 2009. As a result, import filers who file through the Automated Broker Interface (ABI) should be familiar with the final rule changes since they will need to adjust or retain their prior notice submissions in ABI/ACS as noted in the bulleted items below. Please note, however, that prior notices filed through ABI/ACS will be transmitted to FDA for review against the requirements in the final rule. For example, prior notices submitted through ABI/ACS that do not identify the site-specific manufacturer may be accepted for review initially, but upon review by FDA may be refused if they are later deemed inaccurate.

Highlights of the final rule that require careful prior notice data submission by ABI filers:

  • The final rule adds a definition for "manufacturer" and provides an alternative for identifying the manufacturer when the registration number is not known. In addition to the name of the manufacturer, the prior notice submitter must submit either: (a) the registration number of the facility associated with the article of food; or (b) the full address of the site-specific facility and reason (see omitted reason codes in the bullet immediately below) why no registration number is being provided. In contrast to the IFR, the final rule requires the identity of the manufacturer for all entry types, including transportation and exportation entries. The identity of the manufacturer requirement is now currently accomplished by ABI filers through the submission of a manufacturer identification (MID) code for the identified firm.
  • When the final rule takes effect, filers currently submitting prior notice using several currently used "reason" codes (reasons listed in the IFR CPG (70 Federal Register 69160, November 14, 2005) and submitted in lieu of providing the food facility registration number) may no longer do so. Specifically, reason codes G (Individual Gift – label name address in lieu of registration number), I (Samples – Quality Assurance, research or analysis purposes only), J (U.S. Manufacturing facility that is not required to register), L (unable to determine identity of the manufacturer - providing identity of manufacturer's headquarters), M (unable to determine identity of manufacturer or headquarters - providing invoicing firm's identity), and O (Gift Pack for non-business purposes – providing single prior notice and identity of packer) listed in the IFR CPG will not be accepted on or after May 6, 2009. The above listed reasons will officially be omitted from the Customs and Trade Automated Interface Requirements (CATAIR) once the CBP programming changes are completed, but should not be used after May 6, 2009. Other reasons listed in the CPG may continue to be used.
  • The final rule allows, when certain conditions are met, for the submission of the express consignment operator or carrier tracking number in lieu of the anticipated arrival information, Bill of Lading, or Airway Bill number and flight number, which the IFR required. As stated in the final rule, until such time as FDA and CBP issue a determination that ACS or its successor system can accommodate such transactions, the tracking number may not be submitted in lieu of these data elements. ACS programming to allow for the submission of the courier tracking number will not be completed by May 6, 2009. Any filer wishing to submit the courier tracking number in lieu of the above listed information may do so using PNSI.
  • The final rule no longer requires the submission of a fax number for the prior notice transmitter or submitter. Where ACS changes are incomplete and rejections are encountered, ABI filers may continue to include the fax number data as an optional element, or may choose to submit all zeroes in lieu of the actual number.
  • The final rule now requires the submission of the complete address for the shipper, importer, owner, and ultimate consignee (now currently accomplished by ABI filers through the submission of a MID or ESS (encrypted Social Security number or encrypted tax identification (EIN) number) for the identified firm) regardless of whether the facility's food facility registration is also provided. ABI filers may continue to provide the food facility registration numbers for the subject firms in order to facilitate timely FDA review.
  • The final rule does not require the submission of an HTS code for prior notice purposes. However, ABI filers should continue to submit HTS codes where required for CBP purposes.
  • The final rule no longer requires the submission of the country of the license plate for privately owned vehicles, but continues to require the license plate number and the State or Province that issued the plate. Where ACS changes are incomplete and rejections are encountered, ABI filers may continue to include the country of the plate in their transactions.

Questions may be directed to the Prior Notice Center at 1-866-521-2297.

For additional information:

Prior Notice Fact Sheet March 2009

"What You Need to Know About Prior Notice of Imported Food Shipments: A Small Entity Compliance Guide" April 2009

 
< Prev   Next >
OFA Headlines
  • Pause
  • Previous
  • Next
1/7
FDA Calls on Food Companies to Correct Labeling Violations; FDA Commissioner Issues an Open Letter t FDA PRESS RELEASE Mar. 3, 2010 The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has notified 17 food manufacturers that the labeling for 22 of their food products violates the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The action follows an October 2009 statement by Commissioner of Food and Drugs Margaret Hamburg, M.D., encouraging companies to review their labeling to ensure that they were in compliance with FDA regulations, and were truthful and not misleading. For details, please click link below http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm202814.htm
Read more...
 
Latest
Image Excellent Brand Application

Oriental Food Association

1633 Bayshore Hwy #337
Burlingame, CA 94010
Tel: 650-692-6182 Fax: 650-692-6639
Newsflash
Image China Files WTO Complaints Over US Poultry Ban

 Updated April 17, 2009 08:01 PM

GENEVA (Xinhua) - China filed complaints to the World Trade Organization (WTO) today about a US law effectively banning imports of Chinese poultry products, saying the law may violate WTO regulations.

Pursuant to Section 727 of the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009, which was already signed into law, the United States effectively prohibits the establishment or implementation of any measures that would allow poultry products to be imported from China, the Chinese WTO mission said.

China is concerned that Section 727 places restrictions on the import from China of poultry products that are inconsistent with the United States' WTO obligations, it added.

 
OFA Headlines
Protecting U.S. Food Supply May Be Costly, Groups Say Protecting U.S. Food Supply May Be Costly, Gro  Additional rules designed to improve food safety in the U.S. will add costs for businesses and may not be effective, food-industry groups said.

Scares involving the potentially deadly E. coli bacteria, salmonella, listeria and other threats have harmed consumer confidence, prompting industry support for some tougher measures, J. Patrick Boyle, the president of the American Meat Institute, said today at a congressional hearing. The added cost to defend the food supply may be burdensome, he said.

“Only industry can provide safe food,” and voluntary collaboration with government will do more to protect consumers than additional rules, Boyle told the House Agriculture Committee. Boyle’s group represents Tyson Foods Inc., the biggest U.S. meat processor, and other meatpackers.

Congress is increasing the food-safety budget to add inspection resources and considering more than a dozen proposals to combat food-borne illness. They include legislation, approved by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, to grant the Food and Drug Administration authority to order food recalls even when a company refuses to cooperate.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aAD65Z3FeyRo

FDA News
FDA New Guidance for Reporting to the Reportable Food Electronic Portal 3/19/2010 FDA has issued new guidance entitled "Guidance for Industry: Submitting a Report for Multiple Facilities to the Reportable Food Electronic Portal as Established by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007, " which can be found at http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/FoodSafetyPrograms/ucm205209.htm. This document provides guidance intended to assist those parties responsible for complying with the Reportable Food Registry requirements prescribed by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Pub. L.110-085). As required by section 1005(f) of this law, in September 2009, FDA issued guidance to industry about submitting reports of instances of reportable food through the electronic portal and providing notifications to other persons in the supply chain of such articles of food. This guidance document provides further guidance to industry on submitting a single reportable food report to FDA covering reportable food located at more than one of a company’s facilities. FDA has also updated its Questions & Answers For Industry Regarding the HVP Recalled by Basic Food Flavors, Inc. http://www.fda.gov/Food/ResourcesForYou/FoodIndustry/ucm203201.htm Provided by: Lesley Maloney, Pharm.D. Senior Advisor, Industry and Business Relations Office of External Relations/Office of the Commissioner U.S. Food & Drug Administration Office: (301) 827-6252
 
Advertisement

FDA News

Imports Outruns Resource of FDA, Substantial Funding Increases In FY2008

(complied by TC, July 22  2007)

FDA is in charge the safety for the majority goods consumed by public everyday, but you never know FDA has ever got enough resouce to handle this important job.

According to USA Today, "Yet the cantaloupe recalls reveal another vulnerability in the nation's food-safety defenses: Imports are escalating, but the FDA's ability to inspect them and police their safety isn't keeping up, say former FDA officials, government watchdogs and food-safety experts.

The FDA inspects about 1% of the imported foods it regulates, down from 8% in 1992 when imports were far less common.

In contrast, the United States Department of Agriculture, which is responsible for meat and poultry, inspected almost 16% of those imported foods in fiscal 2006. The FDA covers most other foods, about 80% of the nation's food supply."

Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Events Calendar

« < September 2010 > »
S M T W T F S
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 1 2

OFA News

September 18, 2007

In responding to the public's concern of the safety of imported food, Oriental Food Association has hosted a "imported Food Safety Forum on Sept 18, 2007 at Asian Culture Center, Oakland, Califorina. FDA San Francisco District Director Barbara Cassens and USDA SITC Officer John Nelson were invited to give speech. Taylor Chow, Public Relations, represented to Association's position. You may see the first 3 portions of the video by clicking the links below:

Part 1 of 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9xJJ2WsIA8

Part 2 of 6:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpAfw8Qw74g  

Part 3 of 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQJgT_2y1Es 

 

Polls

As an importer, In what way you expect FDA to improve...
 

Who's Online

We have 19 guests online